Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research
نویسندگان
چکیده
Clinical decision-making requires synthesis of evidence from literature reviews focused on a specific theme. Evidence synthesis is performed with qualitative assessments and systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials, typically covering statistical pooling with pairwise meta-analyses. These methods include adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis, network meta-analysis, and mixed-treatment comparison. These tools allow synthesis of evidence and comparison of effectiveness in cardiovascular research.
منابع مشابه
Multi-criteria Logistic Hub Location by Network Segmentation under Criteria Weights Uncertainty (RESEARCH NOTE)
Third party service providers are locating logistic hub for operating their tasks. Finding a proper location helps them to have better performance in competitive environment. Multiple characteristics of proper location selection faces the decision maker to have a multi criteria decision making problem. Since the location decision is a long term planning, the robustness of the decision is gettin...
متن کاملEntrepreneurship policy and innovative indicators of industrial companies: Evaluation by MCDM and ANN Methods
The present paper presented a methodology for prioritizing the innovative and entrepreneurial indicators using Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), taking into account three individual, organizational and cultural dimensions simultaneously in decision making procedure. This methodology has two main advantages: first, the speed of operation in the accounti...
متن کاملUsing Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods for Evaluation the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Indicators
This paper offered a procedure for ranking the entrepreneurial and innovative indicators using Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), taking into account three individual,organizational and cultural dimensions simultaneously in decision making procedure. Henceforward, by using the Meta synthesis framework, the form of group classification of indicators from afinding’s combination was suggested ...
متن کاملComparison of Three Decision-Making Models in Differentiating Five Types of Heart Disease: A Case Study in Ghaem Sub-Specialty Hospital
Introduction: cardiovascular diseases are becoming the main cause of mortality and morbidity in most countries. This research goal was to predict the types of heart diseases for more accurate diagnosis by data mining and neural network technics. Method: This research was an applied-survey study and after data preprocessing, three approaches of neural network, decision making tree and Bayes simp...
متن کاملComparison of Three Decision-Making Models in Differentiating Five Types of Heart Disease: A Case Study in Ghaem Sub-Specialty Hospital
Introduction: cardiovascular diseases are becoming the main cause of mortality and morbidity in most countries. This research goal was to predict the types of heart diseases for more accurate diagnosis by data mining and neural network technics. Method: This research was an applied-survey study and after data preprocessing, three approaches of neural network, decision making tree and Bayes simp...
متن کامل